On 6/19/20 5:04 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2020, 02:04:19 CEST schrieb Simon Lees:
I guess if you were also to think in terms of an architecture like s390x then the total number of packages that it makes sense to support are likely much smaller which would have the potential to push up the percentage failed by a significant amount.
Sounds like a good motivation to fix those failing packages ;-)
Seriously: So far, I haven't seen any indication [1] that s390x will be proposed to become a Tier 1 distro - so there's no need to have a more permissive limit "just in case".
But: Let's talk about this when we discuss to make s390x a Tier 1 distro ;-)
I think the point of this policy is that it should be flexible enough that it doesn't need to be modified again in the future should someone want to work on making s390x or RISC-V a tier 1 distro the rules will already be in place correctly. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B