On 07/11/10 15:40, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
2010/11/7 Pavol Rusnak<prusnak@opensuse.org>:
On 07/11/10 13:53, Pavol Rusnak wrote:
On 04/11/10 19:46, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
There are other good reasons to use libjpeg-turbo, namely the 2-4X speed (also battery) improvement.
I can prepare the package, push it to factory, obsolete and remove all existing ones, this is not a problem. Problem is we have to evaluate possible breakages, so I won't do it before I get GREEN from our openSUSE Release Team (coolo atm).
JFYI: I prepared the newest libjpeg-turbo package in home:prusnak repo. The spec is adapted from Fedora Rawhide, but I changed it accordingly to our shared library policy and added (hopefully correct) Obsoletes and Provides.
That "libjpeg62 obsoletes and provides libjpeg8" is probably wrong? Shouldn't it obsolete/provide libjpeg6?
Right, we have libjpeg8 in 11.3, but we should also take care of older libjpeg6. Fixed. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o openSUSE Boosters Team Lihovarska 1060/12 PGP 0xA6917144 19000 Praha 9 prusnak[at]opensuse.org Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org