![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/a4139df10120ce151e457fd1faff018d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 12/7/20 6:43 PM, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
On 07.12.20 06:51, Emily Roberts wrote:
After submitting the SR the auto review denied the package, so I've switched back to tar_scm to comply with it. Feel free to disregard anything about obs_scm in the previous message.
Haha, again a crazy bot running amok:
Output of check script: Source validator failed. Try "osc service localrun source_validator" (E) gh-1.3.1.tar.gz mentioned in spec file does not exist.
Of course it does not exist:
<service name="tar" mode="buildtime"> <param name="filename">gh-1.3.1</param> </service> <service name="recompress" mode="buildtime"> <param name="compression">gz</param> <param name="file">*.tar</param> </service>
Or the bot just has an old version of source_validator, because it does not complain on my factory box at all.
So we have once again the case of the bot causing a good package being downgraded in quality, just to comply with the bot
🤦
No this bot is enforcing our long standing policy that source tarballs must be present in packages submitted to factory. This way we can ensure that the only way package sources can change is by another submission to factory. So for today you can leave your crusade against the bots and I guess you could replace it with a crusade against our policies although I doubt you will convince people to change this policy. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B