Hi, the distro logos are not an identity. They identify a branch of development. These change over time, as branches also changes, as we just see with the development of MicroOS as a "new" member and/or the upcoming of SlowRoll. As stated before, I identify with the chameleon as logo for the whole project. And this is not subject to change, as far as I have understood this. Also the logos are supposed to be more homogeneous - which a good move especially in hindsight of the big ALP as a common base change. Communication on before was leading into a different direction and it sounded if the whole project's identity is about to change - but that's also partly because of the drama seeking social media. Cheers, Bernd Am 05.01.24 um 10:12 schrieb Richard Brown:
On 2024-01-04 20:34, Lubos Kocman via openSUSE Factory wrote:
I get your concerns, but If you check the wallpaper in 15.6 and 15.5 it's already using the "modernized Leap logo" which "luckily" also won in the survey. So far nobody complained about wallpaper and I feel that the wallpaper was accepted very well. So it's really about finishing what's already halfway done. I'm not touching any other graphics.
https://github.com/openSUSE/branding/blob/leap-15.5/raw-theme-drop/desktop-1...
https://github.com/openSUSE/distribution-logos/tree/main/Leap (so all I need to do is just to submit it here).
I interpret your above reply as "I get your concerns but we're going to move ahead anyway"
This approach, which is has been demonstrated repeatedly in this process, is precisely the source of all of my dislike of any such change.
I wholeheartedly agree with Christian Boltz
Changing something as important as our projects identity should not be forced upon the Project and we have a Membership and Membership votes precisely for ensuring such major changes to the Project proceed with consent of the people who make up the heart of this Project.