Hi Ulf, On Mon, 03 Aug 2020, 16:42:34 +0200, ub22@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
Gesendet: Montag, 03. August 2020 um 11:42 Uhr; Von: "Manfred Hollstein" I'd rather ask why people don't add a proper entry to their /etc/fstab? This way, everything would be OK from rpm's point of view:
/home.server /home none bind 0 0
OK, I was not aware about this entry (so I'm only an experianced user not an Linux professional ;-) ).
But now I added this in the entry and the same with my '/root/bin' now. Are this all pathes which are not allowing symlinks to other pathes. Or will be generelly not allowed to do a symlink to a path?
As a start, look at the output from running the following command: rpm -ql filesystem | while read dir; do [ -d $dir ] && echo $dir; done This will print all directories which are owned by the filesystem package and thusly a candidate for similar trouble, when you're replacing any of them with a symbolic link. There are probably more directories owned by other packages...
We will see if this really fix this Issue.
Only to be sure, will the mounting in /etc/fstab will be done sequential starting at line 1 till the end?
Quoting from "man fstab": The order of records in fstab is important because fsck(8), mount(8), and umount(8) sequentially iterate through fstab doing their thing.
Regards Ulf
HTH, cheers. l8er manfred