On Monday 23 February 2009 05:53:55 pm Vincent Untz wrote:
Le lundi 23 février 2009, à 17:11 -0600, Alberto Passalacqua a écrit :
(I'm not saying we should blindly stay with PA, but I find it a bit weird to disable something at the beginning of a cycle, while we're getting new upstream versions with fixes)
Right. But if we ask this at the end, what would you answer? That we are too late to ask for such a change, which, as you said, GNOME depends on quite a lot. So, I think this is the right time to think to it and discuss about it.
Oh, I'm happy to keep an option on disabling it at the end. I just don't see how disabling it now will help us move forward...
One lesser problematic package that no one knows how it works. Partial diagram is available on the web, and that is about all we can see beside that openSUSE 11.1 works fine without it. If you want more people to test software it should be optional. Pushing as you do now leads to rejection. Many will never see Beagle, Moonlight, Mono, Pulseaudio. I was arguing time and again that opensource needs testing, but testing doesn't mean that every package that I use should be a mine field.
Vincent
-- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
It seems that this doesn't apply here. -- Regards, Rajko -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org