On Dienstag, 23. August 2022 16:47:26 CEST Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Tuesday 2022-08-23 16:15, Predrag Ivanović wrote:
Tangentially related, but consistent naming/versioning of packages built for Leap on OBS would be nice too. Some packages use lp154, some 150400, some $prefix-{lp154|150400},
150400 is for SLE. lp154 is for Leap (which is a superset of SLE).
But what do we gain by having different naming schemes? When looking a some relevant RPM macros/variables, both SLE and Leap use % {sle_version} == 150400. We also have "bp154" for the SLE backports repository. Maybe "sle154" would be a better version suffix, distinguishing between different "sources" for packages with different support levels (though this is likely not relevant for Leap users), but keeping the actual version part the same. Kind regards, Stefan