Hi Joe, On 29.03.23 18:35, Joe Salmeri wrote:
On 3/29/23 12:00, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, Joe Salmeri wrote:
Since you seem to IGNORE facts, let's review them.
The problem is with a PAM configuration file, let's see what osc reports for owners and maintainers....
ocs maintainer -e pam returns
Defined in package: Linux-PAM/pam bugowner of pam : valentin.lefebvre@suse.com
This
maintainer of pam : josef.moellers@suse.com
and this is the information you want.
Defined in project: Linux-PAM bugowner of pam : -
maintainer of pam : mc@suse.com, kukuk@suse.com, wolfgang.engel@suse.com, -, valentin.lefebvre@suse.com, -
Project maintainers also inherit the "rights" to a package, but they do not magically become responsible for all package in a project.
And kubuk@suse.com is YOU! Therefore, YOU were NOT randomly added YOU were added because ocs maintainer lists YOU as a maintainer! No, you did read the output wrong. I'm maintainer of the devel project like the rest of the last line not mentioned above as bugowner or maintainer, not of "pam". The last line alone is a little bit misleading if you ignore the "Defined in project: Linux-PAM" above.
So once AGAIN, YOU are LYING and spreading FALSE and MISLEADING information. You proved above that I'm not lying and that I'm not a maintainer of pam, now I'm expecting an excuse from you for your wrong claim I'm lying.
You CLAIMED numerous times that I added RANDOM people to the bug.
Well, maybe there is a language barrier about the interpretation of the word "random". Fact is, you added people to the bug who are not responsible for the package.
That is a LIE and that is a FACT as I ONLY added people that were listed in the lines which say bug owner or maintainer.
Your name is CLEARLY in the list of "maintainer of pam"
No, Thorsten is maintainer of the project, not the package.
You are also listed in the PAM manuals as one of the authors.
Probably from many years ago.
Yes, I did PROVE you lied because I did NOT add RANDOM people.
I don't think this tone will further your cause.
If you are NOT a maintainer of PAM then I suggest you remove yourself from the LIST which INCLUDES you.
If it was me, I'd immediately do that and stop maintaining the other packages in the project, too. Example: I am listed as a maintainer in the hardware project. I am maintaining exactly 0 (ZERO) packages in that project. $ osc maintainer wpa_supplicant Defined in package: hardware/wpa_supplicant bugowner of wpa_supplicant : cfconrad, kbabioch maintainer of wpa_supplicant : kbabioch, cfconrad Defined in project: hardware bugowner of wpa_supplicant : - maintainer of wpa_supplicant : lrupp, elvigia, seife, hreinecke, trenn, duwe, seilerphilipp, a_faerber, tsaupe, michals, group:factory-maintainers So *IF* you add me to a wpa_supplicant bugreport, this will help nobody. I probably cannot do anything about the problem and the real maintainer might never know.
There is NO excuse from me as it is a FACT that you are listed on the maintainer of PAM list.
He is listed as maintainer of the project, not the package. There are probably other packages in the project. Even if there are none, many projects have people listed as maintainers in an administrative fashion: they are just there to give other people package maintenance rights, or to create new packages to be maintained by other people.
I did not expect you to apologize for YOUR MISTAKE because you don't seem like that kind of person to own up to your mistakes.
You have WASTED so many peoples time with your LIES and FALSE claims and I am DONE with you.
It would really be nice if the thread could end now. This tone is IMHO not acceptable. -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman