et al: Just responding over here, as someone who did take the survey . . . as always the questions steer the taker in certain predetermined directions . . . which then lead to conclusions. As an older GUI user of various linux distros I "like" Leap, for a "stable" release option in the openSUSE paradigm. I don't recall if there was a question on "keep Leap going as it is???" but I would have clicked that option . . . . I think the questions were, "If you came to a fork in the road, would you choose 'linarite' or would you choose 'slowroll'?" In that choice I said "slowroll" which would be more like Manjaro, where a small number of packages gets upgraded every few weeks . . . which would be closer to what Leap has been. I do "like" "fresh horsies" in my OSs . . . newer kernels seem to be faster handling . . . but, at times the "total and complete rebuild of every nook and cranny" of TW does require more processor time, and that is where Leap offers "systematic stability" that for many end users is a good choice for a daily driver. I think there are a fair number of openSUSE users who would opt for the stable release offering of Leap. And that follows the Debian model of providing, "unstable," "testing," and finally "stable" release offerings, to provide different user needs with something close to their style.