Am Mittwoch, 3. Januar 2024, 20:23:25 CET schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
* Christian Boltz <opensuse@cboltz.de> [01-03-24 12:41]:
Hallo zusammen,
Am Mittwoch, 3. Januar 2024, 16:55:08 CET schrieb Lubos Kocman via openSUSE Factory:
Leap already has a wallpaper including the newly elected logo, perhaps we could scan for some other occurrences of the old logo. I see one in "About system" in gnome-settings. I suspect that KDE will have a similar placement.
I'm not sure if this is a good idea.
The logo survey had some serious flaws, most important: it did not include our current logo, despite being submitted by someone. (And I'll not even start with the detail that it wasn't automatically included. Even I am not evil enough to come up with such an idea.)
The main reason why the logo discussion is currently quiet is that we got a promise that there will be a membership vote where we can choose between the current and the possible new logo.
However, that also means that geeko, our current logo is still our logo. I have serious doubts that the majority of our members want a new logo, therefore it might be a good idea not to replace our current logo until we had the membership vote about it. (Unless someone is keen to possibly revert several *-branding packages.)
agreed. Changing logos is about changing IDENTITY. why would we want to do that. is our history not something to be proud of?
+1 You dont change an identity or brand just for the fun of it. Only if there is a certain reason, e.g. because it is burned or the scope of your business changes I see neither of these reasons for openSUSE My 2c Axel