On 2023-11-03 10:29, Simon Lees wrote:
Just because something has a wiki page with documentation doesn't make it official, when people were working on the full official documentation for openSUSE it was intentionally omitted.
Oh the irony given how much stuff they included that was explicitly in opposition to the wishes of our actual developers… It’s quite simple - from a legal/liability/licensing perspective only the stuff actually in the openSUSE distros can be considered covered under the openSUSE License Anything else can be removed at any time, for any reason as described in https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Terms_of_Service And that’s in addition to any devel or home project being at the whim of the devel or home maintainers - their repos, their rules. So if anyone wants to rely on a package, having it in an openSUSE distro is a whole bunch safer than any alternative -- Richard Brown Distributions Architect SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 146, D-90461 Nuremberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Managing Directors/Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich