On Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2025, 16:35:51 CET Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 16:28 +0100, Adam Majer wrote:
There really isn't much nomenclature. Gitea only supports flat org structure, and you can use [_A-Za-z0-9]+ as valid org names. You can edit the wiki if you prefer something specific. For example `firmware` for the Kernel:firmware would sound reasonable?
Does that mean I can't do multiple test projects as was currently done in home:dimstar:* for multiple purposes?
e.g. I have home:dimstar:Factory for my 'regular, short-lived' Factory fixes (as mentioned early)
Sure, you still can. You still can use project links and overlay packages. Or you can fork entire factory git (once it is converted), so you can work a fixed source snapshot. Something what we supported before only in same cases.
home:dimstar:meson - a longer-lived branch where I was experimenting for RPM 4.20 / BuildSystem: syntax (with different prjconf, to get this going)
home:dimstar:kill-xdm: a very, very long lived branch (which gets too few attention) working on multiple angles of the distro.
Granted, many of my projects are not just for building a package - that part has always been easy - but to actually prepare rather complete stack-updates (or proposing major reworks like dropping/obsoleting - or at least no longer mandating - the xdm wrapper)
Would that translate in generating different orgs which are then linked up to the different projects in OBS?
I don't see why you need different orgs here, you can also all maintain it in your personal space in gitea if your want. -- Adrian Schroeter <adrian@suse.de> Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev