On 6/7/21 12:21 AM, Ben Greiner wrote:
Am 14.04.21 um 22:16 schrieb Luca Beltrame:
In data mercoledì 14 aprile 2021 14:46:24 CEST, Ben Greiner ha scritto:
As mentioned before, I would favor devel:languages:python:pyqt. I volunteer to participate in maintaining the project, but of course it is at the discretion of the existing maintainers. I'm not sure if I worded it correctly, but I was in agreement with d:l:p:pyqt.
Despite repeated inquiries, Matej is still vetoing d:l:p:pyqt. [1]
* SIP and PyQt[56] are not from the same developers as Qt or KDE * SIP (python-sip) has nothing to do with KDE:Qt* * PyQt[56] is the main but not the only consumer of SIP - Thus, following Simon's argument [2], python-qt5*, python-PyQt6* and python-sip* should be in the same devel project. * Qt Libraries are packaged into separate projects for each minor version. * The most recent version of PyQt5 compiles with any Qt5 version. The most recent version of PyQt6 compiles with any Qt6 version. - Thus, putting python-PyQt6 into a KDE:Qt6.X project would be wrong
With the bullet points above, one could argue to put everything into devel:languages:python, but that collides with Matej's veto and Simon's argument. If we can't get d:l:p:pyqt, IMHO the next best thing would be KDE:Qt:PyQt.
To me this probably makes slightly more sense then d:l:p:pyqt, d:l:p has never contained all our python packages, packages that are mostly bindings of C / C++ libraries have always tended to live with those libraries. Cheers -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B