On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Dr. Werner Fink <werner@suse.de> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Kyrill Detinov <lazy.kent@opensuse.org> wrote:
I've just found that the systemd package includes 369 files (381 already, while writing this message). I'm shocked. openSUSE applied 300+ patches??? Is systemd good and stable for openSUSE? It seems, NO.
I see, every systemd commit to Factory is ~ +10 patches. What's the hell systemd is good for openSUSE? Looking at Fedora? No Fedora way, please. We are openSUSE.
That's openSUSE supporting systemd through patches. Since systemd is in such a horrible state, openSUSE has to fix tons of stuff, and it has. I've seen the improvement in stability at least in my setups. Those patches will eventually be part of systemd, because openSUSE has folks that persevere in trying to convince their developers of the need for them. I think that must be applauded.
Sorry but this is simply not true. Most of the patches *are* part of the current upstream version! You may have a look into the patch collection and read the git headers.
What is not true? (there are many assertions in the quoted paragraph) I never quantified how many were backports and how many were fixes, and will accept the previous post numbers, but I know from following the list and using the distribution that lots of thing have been fixed since the first systemd-enabled release, and lots of those fixes were pushed by openSUSE contributions. So, to which are you referring there as false? Is openSUSE not contributing as much as I say? Does everything come from upstream? Or does upstream refuse everything perhaps? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org