data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6c9a/e6c9a4261443678e4dc87b60198b32d9e929423b" alt=""
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:20:49 +0200 Johannes Segitz <jsegitz@suse.de> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 09:50:47AM +0200, Cathy Hu wrote:
So please keep AA alive
We don't intend to change anything in AppArmor (I can't btw, I am not the maintainer :)). We will just change the default in the installer, please feel free to select AppArmor on new installations if you prefer it over SELinux.
Just to make sure that this is fully understood: How AA support is handled is not something we (on the SELinux side) decide. There were discussions within SUSE to drop AA support, as it would be dead code for us going forward. I'm not a fan of the idea, as people should be free to chose in my opinion. But if this happens or not is decided by people that manage the products. And on the openSUSE side this also is depending on the project leadership keeping AA support.
Hi, I am just curious who manage the Tumbleweed product? I know that it is do-ocracy, but I am not sure if it works well for product decisions like what to support, what will be default, etc. I would really like to see some steering committee that is entrusted to do such decision, as for installer it will be much easier to have counterpart to ask/discuss product decisions (e.g. also to help new users with pre-selected DE whatever will be ). Josef P.S. I am not against this change and have nothing against SELinux nor AppArmor, just not sure how exactly works decision making for TW ( and sometimes even Leap ).
Johannes