Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:08:32 +0100 Robert Kaiser <KaiRo@KaiRo.at> wrote:
Given that, as well as some claimed legal unclarities with it, and OTOH the claimed (by Jörg) legal unclarities of wodim, I personally start to think that we should exclude both wodim and cdrecord from being shipped in any default Linux distro. ;-)
There's a small difference: only Jörg claims that there is no license problem with cdrtools and only Jörg claims that there is a license problem with wodim.
Please do not spread lies..... The Sun legal department (and later the Oracle legal department under different constraints) did make a review on cdrtools and both see no problem with the original code. There is no other trustworthy lawyer that did ever make a license review for cdrtools, so what do you like to tell us here?
And of course the lawyers he talked to also are of Jörgs opinion. The lawyers I talked to are not.
As long as you don't name them, we need to call this FUD :-( Jörg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org