On 3/29/23 12:00, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, Joe Salmeri wrote:
Since you seem to IGNORE facts, let's review them.
The problem is with a PAM configuration file, let's see what osc reports for owners and maintainers....
ocs maintainer -e pam returns
Defined in package: Linux-PAM/pam bugowner of pam : valentin.lefebvre@suse.com
maintainer of pam : josef.moellers@suse.com
Defined in project: Linux-PAM bugowner of pam : -
maintainer of pam : mc@suse.com, kukuk@suse.com, wolfgang.engel@suse.com, -, valentin.lefebvre@suse.com, -
And kubuk@suse.com is YOU! Therefore, YOU were NOT randomly added YOU were added because ocs maintainer lists YOU as a maintainer! No, you did read the output wrong. I'm maintainer of the devel project like the rest of the last line not mentioned above as bugowner or maintainer, not of "pam". The last line alone is a little bit misleading if you ignore the "Defined in project: Linux-PAM" above.
So once AGAIN, YOU are LYING and spreading FALSE and MISLEADING information. You proved above that I'm not lying and that I'm not a maintainer of pam, now I'm expecting an excuse from you for your wrong claim I'm lying.
You CLAIMED numerous times that I added RANDOM people to the bug. That is a LIE and that is a FACT as I ONLY added people that were listed in the lines which say bug owner or maintainer. Your name is CLEARLY in the list of "maintainer of pam" You are also listed in the PAM manuals as one of the authors. Yes, I did PROVE you lied because I did NOT add RANDOM people. If you are NOT a maintainer of PAM then I suggest you remove yourself from the LIST which INCLUDES you. There is NO excuse from me as it is a FACT that you are listed on the maintainer of PAM list. I did not expect you to apologize for YOUR MISTAKE because you don't seem like that kind of person to own up to your mistakes. You have WASTED so many peoples time with your LIES and FALSE claims and I am DONE with you.