Hi, currently we have an inconsistency with naming debuginfo packages for multilib packages (-32bit, -64bit). Packages that build multilibs themselves like gcc produce for example libgcc_s1-32bit to which then rpm appends -debuginfo to form libgcc_s1-32bit-debuginfo. This is upstream rpm behavior. Now we have another way of producing multilib packages, namely via the baselibs.conf machinery which has a default rule to produce libgcc_s1-debuginfo-32bit. This is inconsistent and results in gdb making invalid suggestions about debuginfo packages to install (it suggests glibc-32bit-debuginfo instead of glibc-debuginfo-32bit). The proposal is to fix the SUSE specific baselibs.conf script to instead produce X-32bit-debuginfo from X-debuginfo. If there are no objections to this plan we'll go forward with this. Richard. -- Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org