-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Felix-Nicolai Müller schrieb: | As I said, the process has already be improved, but even when opening | the thread on KDE4 for 11.1 it was not made clear how the process to | reach those options given was achieved. I now know what the devs think | to be legit and possible but I do not know who said what when and why. | This points directly to the general problem and what I describe as | missing transparency. I want to know the true reasons, which I | ultimately only can if I can get a transcript of the discussion how | those options were reached. To give you a better example: I filed a bug | report against the non-alphabetical ordering of DEs in 11.0 installer. | It was closed with the comment "This was well thought through by us". | Sadly the bug was removed from bugzilla (at least I can't find it no | more), but yaloki remembers the bug including the response. When I get | such a response for making myself a fool for creating bug reports I feel | entitled to know the anonymous mass of "us" and the definition of "well | thought through". So basically: Who said what when and where. This is incorrect: Benjiman pointed me to the correct bug: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381420#c7 Sorry and HTH Felix -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIxjWdaQ44ga2xxAoRAu06AKCLFhQhpHdfg3U+09dw6q2CcitdWwCePGT8 qSwnU4U7g/ps1sSP2ACItpo= =tPmO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org