* Robert Schiele <rschiele@gmail.com> [Jan 19. 2007 11:24]:
No, I did not miss that discussion but I can't see why all these use cases have to be unified into a single use case that just does not exist in reality.
Its not a unification, its what these use cases have in common.
So why do we need "base package set" at all?
Such a pattern would be helpful when displaying dependency problems. E.g. when removing glibc from a system, instead of listing hundreds of packages with broken dependencies, YaST could simple tell "this breaks your base system"
Why do you need a set of packages to name "openSUSE"? If a set of packages fulfilles the specific needs of a use case then the set is fine, if it does not, it is broken for that use case.
We need to identify the distribution in order to assign the correct update repository. Klaus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org