Hi, I'm wondering that since some time but again found some examples where I just don't understand our current naming conventions. The examples I mean python3-mailman golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter golang-github-prometheus-prometheus I somewhat understand such a naming convention for typical modules. This is what we had since ages and it's important if a module is for python2, python3 or golang indeed. But for standalone software like mailman, prometheus-node-exporter and prometheus itself? I don't care if the thing is written in python, golang or $WHATEVER. I also do not care if it's hosted on github. Debian package names are e.g. prometheus prometheus-node-exporter So is this really a reasonable approach to package naming? Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org