Am 21.06.19 um 20:52 schrieb Luca Beltrame:
Il giorno Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:43:00 +0200 Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
Would really be better than - update to 2.4.1:
Yes. Because it actually tracks all the files that have been changed. This is even more important for packages that ship a lot of up/downstream patches.
No, as lined out in the other mail, in this case it is totally fine, looking at the last ~20 changelog entries, to mention that all the patches that had been mentioned in those entries have now been removed again, because they are what the new version consists of.
I, as someone who takes some pride in its packages, refuse to create such a braindead changelog. I'd rather have the package not included in {Leap,Factory}.
Are you implying that all the other packagers, including those who actually are on this mailing list, don't take "pride" in their packaging? Just asking.
No, they probably just have different standards wrt "beauty" (which is in the eye of the beholder, of course). Or they just deem their changelogs as "nobody really will read this, anyway" (which might be true). I, for my packages, want sane, usable changelogs. If that means, the package can not be part of Factory, so be it. -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org