El 30/04/13 21:04, Joachim Schrod escribió:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-04-30T11:38:19, Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de> wrote:
That's why it is called --verify and not --repair .. (not implemented yet, never advertised as repair either) How can such untested alpha quality stuff make it into a distro?
Because the community didn't object when it was merged, or during the beta phase.
Oh, many of us objected, but were ignored.
Objecting does not mean anything, those who do the work are the ones that take decisions. In fact, look at
Christian's reaction to Stefan's bug report -- no comment needed, denial at its best.
What denial ? He pointed out 3 problems, - one bogus based on the a misunderstading on what "runtime journal files" mean. - The other one is where he says --verify does not fix broken journal files, this is expected, it has never gained the capability of fixing the files nor it was advertised that it did, what the command line flags do is clearly documented in the manual. - The other problem he mentioned I told it was a bug. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org