Greetings.
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:20:46 +0000, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <adrian.glaubitz@suse.com> wrote:
On 10/1/19 4:06 PM, Tomas Chvatal wrote:
There were 296 people voting and out of those 52 selected chromium as their default base.
What about the other 244 users?
And what about all the people who visited the poll but refused to cast a vote due to the deeply flawed methodology? (I'm speaking specifically about presenting users with a completely different question than the one they were expecting from the advertisement in this mailing list, and about forcing users to choose between a fixed set of two browsers.) My understanding is that idea behind this poll was to figure out if
On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 16:36 +0200, Tristan Miller wrote: there is big enough minority of chromium users to justify more investment in its testing - and it seems that there is. How would a different question change the result? How would including other browsers affect the outcome? Who was forcing users to choose - did someone point a gun to your head and ask you to choose between chromium and firefox?
I don't think there's anything we can or should infer from the results of this poll.
Would you mind defining who is "we"? Or in other words, are you one of openSUSE release managers? Or one of people writing openQA tests for openSUSE:Factory? Or are you just one of people who under umbrella of "we" want to tell others what they should do or even what they are not allowed to do? Regards Martin