On 9/14/2011 2:49 AM, Roger Luedecke wrote:
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:31:31 PM Karl Eichwalder wrote:
Am Mon 12 Sep 2011 11:59:12 PM CEST schrieb Roger Luedecke
<roger.luedecke@gmail.com>:
Then sudenly a church wants to move Sword over to the factory repo from Education (where it is properly classified and placed) and now people can't just stop and take a breath.
IMO, it is not. Adding the reader software is probably ok (assuming that it is untainted), but adding the contents is not. I also do not add arbitrary books from gutenberg.org and especially not all the translations.
If the sword developers need a file for testing convert a free document about Linux into the bible format, and you are done.
This is my very personal view. Well, what is the point of having an education repo at all then?
Repos hold software, or documentation about software, not general library books. What's so special about software relevant to education that it must also come with the content it manipulates? I'm sure there are a few exceptions where the "content" is really only expressible by the code itself and just isn't a separate or separable data set, and some where the data is separate and not technically necessary to bundle with the app but it is anyways for one reason or another, but I think those are both by far the exception. -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org