Ruediger Meier wrote:
On Tuesday 25 October 2011, Per Jessen wrote:
Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Probably two different "minimal" patterns would really be more useful:
* minimal server (text mode) * minimal remotely useful server :-)
Yeah, I think we could do with an another pattern for minimal size. Maybe embedded/all-on-chip systems would also benefit from this?
Like I've mentioned in my other emails in this thread I would not waste too much time about minimizing the package selection.
If you really have 7000 VMs where every MB counts then you won't go 7000 times through the installation DVD anyway but maintaining a selfmade package list instead.
Very true. I'm personally not keen on a tiny installation either.
More important is IMO to keep the next "server selection" similar to the last one to let users have less surprises.
Completely agree. I think I did run a diff on the packages selected in 11.3 and in 11.4, and posted that in the bugreport. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (9.3°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org