On 27 November 2013 11:34, Raymond Wooninck <tittiatcoke@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 11:49:49 C wrote:
Whatever happened with the whole thing of Cisco and H.264? http://blogs.cisco.com/collaboration/open-source-h-264-removes-barriers-webr tc
Reading this article, then this is not applicable for Chromium. As stated, Cisco will provide a binary. Chromium however has it's own code to provide support for the H.264 codec, so my assumption here is that this does not fall under the Cisco arrangement.
Can we at least still plug-in PepperFlash with this new Chromium build with less codecs?
This has no effect whatsoever on PepperFlash which is provided through Packman.
Hi Raymond. Rather than perpetuate the discussion as IANAL, I recommend sending this over to Ciaran Farrell as he is indeed a lawyer (one of SUSE's fine legal team). Let him advise what can and can't be done from a legal perspective. Regards, Andy -- Andrew Wafaa IRC: FunkyPenguin GPG: 0x3A36312F -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org