On Friday 2015-01-09 23:41, Linda Walsh wrote:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Is there a particular reason we still use pam_securetty.so? With `systemd-nspawn -b`, one needs an entry for "console", with `machinectl login`, somehow allowing pts/* as well. The same probably goes for kmscon.
Am I understanding that 'PAM' has also been replaced by systemd?
We can't mindread, so we do not know if you understand it as such.
What's machinectl?
A utility like xm(1) used to control certain aspects of virtualization guest.
Would it be used to add the above?
No. xm and machinectl are used on the host. The securetty issue occurs in the guest.
I see it used in /etc/pam.d/remote as well as /etc/pam.d/rlogin.
rlogin is clear, but what progs use 'remote'?
Ever bothered to look at the file?
FWIW -- I've found 'rlogin' to be about 3-5X faster than ssh (over a closed/internal network).
I've found DOS to boot significantly faster to prompt than Windows. Does not mean that it is desirable. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org