Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Bjoern Voigt <bjoernv@arcor.de> wrote:
Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
Dne středa 27. dubna 2016 21:03:57 CEST, Karl Ove Hufthammer napsal(a):
When I report a bug in KDE using DrKonqi, it inserts the following information at the top of the bug report:
Distribution: "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)"
Where is this date (2016-01-17) taken from, and what does it mean? (Note that I’m using the latest release of Tumbleweed, *not* one from January 2016.) $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160417) (x86_64)" I have 2016-01-17 too, but 2016-04-17 in /etc/os-release:
$ lsb_release -r Release: 20160117 $ lsb_release -ds "openSUSE Tumbleweed (20160117) (x86_64)" $ rpm -qf /etc/os-release openSUSE-release-20160417-1.1.x86_64
lsb_release takes information from /etc/lsb-release which is created during lsb package install. As "lsb" itself is not updated after initial installation, this file is not updated either.
It's created during build. So as long as there's no full rebuild it won't update. Does /etc/lsb-release need to exist anyways? If not the lsb_release command could just parse /etc/os-release instead. If /etc/lsb-release is really needed as file it should probably point to somewhere in /var instead where a trigger on openSUSE-release could update it. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org