Am 01.05.2013 03:04, schrieb Joachim Schrod:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-04-30T11:38:19, Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de> wrote:
That's why it is called --verify and not --repair .. (not implemented yet, never advertised as repair either) How can such untested alpha quality stuff make it into a distro?
Because the community didn't object when it was merged, or during the beta phase.
Oh, many of us objected, but were ignored. In fact, look at Christian's reaction to Stefan's bug report -- no comment needed, denial at its best.
Even though I don't agree with Cristian completely regarding systemd and journal, I have to defend him here: * he does care for bug reports. * he does fix stuff. My gripes are more with systemd upstream and the mindset there (and of course it is a good question to blindly follow an upstream, no matter how stupid it might be, but that is a different question). About "those who are doing the work decide": the problem is, that now the ones trying to keep sysvinit alive are actively combatted by the systemd proponents by removing all the init scripts so that they have to fork the whole distribution and not just maintain a single package. -- Stefan Seyfried "If your lighter runs out of fluid or flint and stops making fire, and you can't be bothered to figure out about lighter fluid or flint, that is not Zippo's fault." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org