On 5/22/2011 10:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:37:31AM +0200, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Why in Tumbleweed we have 2.6.39x and in Factory we have 2.6.38x ?
Shouldn't factory have the same or a bit in advance ?
It should, and it will catch up, I wanted to get .39 into Tumbleweed due to it fixing a number of bugs that people were reporting.
thanks,
greg k-h
This would be one example item of many of what I mean when I say things like "TW is not advisable, has no plan, is a great idea but not well implemented etc..." The fact that a bug is definitely in a current kernel, and supposedly fixed in a newer kernel, or even if it's definitely fixed in the newer kernel, does NOT make that kernel a suitable kernel for a repo that you tell people is "stable". How well tested is this kernel before you put it into TW? It supposedly fixes this bug, but breaks what else? It should have been in Factory or kotd or some repo that is used by some people for some amount of time before it goes into TW, or else you should take out the word stable from all TW documentation and references. -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org