Hi; On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Duncan Mac-Vicar P. <dmacvicar@suse.de> wrote:
On 11/17/2010 09:13 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > You beat me to it. My plan was to compile whole factory with clang aka
BSD. But... please package 2.9 svn instead of 2.8 because SVN has important fixes for compiling Qt, mplayer, ffmpeg, x264 and anything that uses inline assembly. I am day by day tracking clang against ffmpeg SVN.
Interesting point.
Packages BuildRequiring LLVM usually require an specific version.
I would love to package 2.9svn, but rubinius, Mono, etc, work with 2.8 only. (actually 2.6, but I have a patch for rubinius and Mono should work with 2.8 too).
However I am pretty sure more than one app won't work with 2.8. This bring the question whether it makes sense to version the package so that we can have more than one in parallel (ie: llvm2_8 llvm2_9), however LLVM is already a "big" package, and this would make life more complex.
Another solution is to have always latest release + llvm-head (2 packages) in the devel:tools:compiler repo, but the released one on Factory.
Is there a reason we can't have llvm-head (I would rather choose the name llvm-beta though) in the Factory too? Otherwise sounds like a great idea. Regards, ismail -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org