On Friday, 4 October 2019 12:13 Richard Brown wrote:
On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 11:41 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Are you really asking this question? Of course, sometimes I work on stuff with 10 years of changes and I do this regularly.
Then you will be delighted that you can use "git log" / "git blame" in the future instead of grepping bluez.changes.
Grepping "git log" will only be useful if we make it absolutely mandatory for the log messages to include the patch filenames being removed.
I doubt that's what Stefan meant, rather something like git log [-p] -- <patch-file> which is more convenient and more reliable without requiring specially formated commit messages or log entries. We should not forget that this whole "all touched patches must be mentioned literally in changelog entry" rule is just a mean to work around the absence of this kind of feature. Michal Kubecek -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org