On Sunday 2013-10-20 02:00, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Friday, 2013-10-18 at 16:39 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Why would *anyone* want to still use reiser3? There are, arguably, better choices available in this decade.
Really?
What filesystem is better for a million small files?
Better for what usecase, though? - ro - space: probably squashfs - interoperability: iso9660/udf - rw - speed: xfs (David Chinner does regular talks/videos with graphs) - wear-leveling support: one of the oodles of flash fs (I do not have enough information on this one) - snapshots: btrfs - interoperability: vfat (+ posixovl) - distributedness: one of the handful of cluster solutions (ceph/gluster/...) Still in flux so as to make a definite answer For each, you pay a price, though. And usually in the realm of "\forall x \in f, can't pick more than two at most". For reiser3, I do not see more than one x offered to pick from. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org