greg.freemyer@gmail.com wrote:
On August 28, 2015 5:53:33 AM EDT, Per Jessen <per@computer.org> wrote:
Michal Kubecek wrote:
Michal Kubecek wrote:
And that's the point: most of those still running i586 distributions do run them on 64-bit capable hardware - because
On Friday 28 of August 2015 10:15:03 Per Jessen wrote: they
believe
(a) they don't need x86_64 unless they have >4GB of memory (b) it consumes less memory (c) it consumes less disk space It's not about belief, I can easily prove (b) to you. I don't care about (a) and (c). OK, I'm pretty sure does consume _less_ memory. However, I seriously doubt you can prove to me the difference is (except for artificially crafted examples) big enough to outweigh the drawbacks of i586.
Nothing artificial about it - in production, I can run many more postfix instances on 32bit than on 64bit. I have been doing this for more than ten years. In this environment, I haven't noticed any drawbacks of i586, but please do enlighten me.
Per,
I'm very curious if a 64-bit kernel with primarily a 32-bit userspace would get you similar ram usage.
It seems reasonable for opensuse to create a hybrid 64-bit kernel / 32-bit userspace release.
From my perspective that seems like it would have very similar ram usage characteristics, but eliminate having the kernel having artificial memory constraints.
Hi Greg, I completely agree - it was suggested to me some time ago, and I have been wanting to try it out for a while. I think I did once have a look at building e.g. a 32bit postfix or apache on a 64bit system, I can't remember why I didn't pursue it. /Per -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org