On lundi, 20 février 2017 11.15:24 h CET Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 10:59 +0100, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Once installed, due to its failure, in the for example case we have today, it prevent smooth up(dgr)ate. It could be a service to end-users ;-) I admit I've not the global vision and being able to weight the burden that create in contribution.
That argument is valid for all 11k packages in TW; once installed, then it breaks in TW, an upgrade of said package will be tough. Still, I hope you're not suggesting to add 11k packages to the rings and try to stage stuff with.
Cheers, Dominique
Nope this is certainly not the idea. I'm in the process to understand what, when and why our process can trouble day to day live of our targeted users (admin, dev, power and co.) and if we can, then how improve the situation, which means I've to ask «non-sense, dumbs» question to get a better vision of all. btw with a bit of bad faith I would say 11k minus 6480 texlive-*, minus 5588 ghc-* :-) Really thanks for your anwsers. -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch Bareos Partner, openSUSE Member, fsfe fellowship GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org