On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Richard Brown wrote:
But how do you rationalise your perspective above that alternate views should be respected, at the same time that both you and Olaf are dismissing the view that change is not a bad thing?
Change - as an abstract term - is not good or bad per se. Each change brings some benefit (or at least it should, to be seriously considered) and usually also has some negative side effects. Whether you say "Each change is good because change is progress, progress is good, mkay..." or "Each change is bad, I want everything to stay as it was.", it's equally wrong. Instead, each change should be considered for its positive and negative effects and weighted carefully if the benefits are worth the trouble (or harm). In this particular case, the benefit is making the file names more formally corect and the cost is actual harm for real people and their systems. Of course, you are well known for your disregard of people using packages or repositories not belonging to the distribution and for discouraging such practice. But your view is far from universal and breaking such systems is a problem which outweights the benefit of formal file name corectness by far. Michal Kubecek -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org