tags 12427 notabug thanks Linda Walsh wrote: ...
Do you have reason to believe they have buggy code by default? I'll Cc' the coreutils bug-list on this and open a bug-report on this as should have been done originally, and maybe your questions can be addressed.
Hi Linda, Do you realize that by merely sending a message to bug-coreutils, you have created an entry in our bug-tracking software? Here it is: http://bugs.gnu.org/12427 If you can describe what you think is a bug in upstream coreutils, we welcome such reports, but when you are not sure (as your message implies), please address your mail to the coreutils@gnu.org mailing list instead. That is a more general forum, e.g., for discussion, where each new thread does not create a new bug-tracking issue that someone will end up having to re-read, maybe mark as "notabug" and close some day. In the future, if you open an issue, you're welcome (encouraged, even) to close it yourself if/when you realize that the issue is not considered a bug. To close bug DDDDD, just send an email to DDDDD-done@debbugs.gnu.org where DDDDD is your bug number. That will save others the time and trouble of having to close it for you, leaving them more time to address issues that *are* deemed to be bugs. The entire set of bugs: http://debbugs.gnu.org/coreutils Here are some graphs: http://debbugs.gnu.org/rrd/coreutils.html I've gone ahead and closed this issue (via the Cc' above), but if you have details on a bug, please start a new thread here to create a new one. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org