Benji Weber wrote:
On 08/04/2008, Per Jessen <per@computer.org> wrote:
Hmm, I could be wrong, but "uninstallable" does seem to mean "not installable"?
It does here, but a more common interpretation of the word would be "Can be uninstalled". The ambiguity makes it a poor choice here. It is used like this all over zypp too.
Ah, I see - yes, that's an unnecessary ambiguity.
Instead I think "Do not forbid installation" is pretty unusual - why not say "ignore this dependency/requirement" ?
Because it's not ignoring the requirement, it's asking about whether to allow installation of a requirement. That's how I read it anyway.
Sorry, my mistake, I misread it. "do not forbid" is still pretty quirky IMHO - what's wrong with "allow"? /Per Jessen, Zürich --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org