On 2013-05-04 09:34:14 +0200, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
I fixed many of the listed packages, however submissions were rejected, the changelog police thinks nicer change entries are more important than getting stuff building, the priorities seem to be placed somewhere else.
I will not resubmit any change. someone else will have to deal with it.
Can you pass around some sr numbers? Seems like there is room for review-team debate. Would be great if you as a frequent submitter could express your concerns to the team.
IMHO ... if you cant follow a simple changes entry policy ... how should we trust you did proper work to fix the problem. In all seriousness: fixing a package is one thing, proper documentation/changes entry is another. a very recent article explains this problem nicely: http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/48933156625/5-useful-tips-for-a-better-com... maybe think about if commit messages like [[[ - Fix build with automake 1.13 ]]] is really better than [[[ - added patch foo-1.1_automake_1.13.patch: Fix build with automake 1.13 by disabling -Werror ]]] first message: i have *no* idea what you did. i would need to dig through the history to find that out. While you might still know what you did this week. will you still remember what you did in a few weeks or months? I doubt it. changes entries are a very important communication channel to users, fellow packagers and yourself in a few months. take the time for proper communication. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org