Jason Newton wrote:
pam_faillock is part of the recommended RHEL configuration for secured computers and holding out for pam_tally2 also presents a nasty non-uniformity for nearly the same functionality (although, weaker).
I've asked the author, Tomas Mraz, to make the patch available standalone - which he has provided here: http://people.redhat.com/tmraz/pam_faillock/ Could you please describe the main features of pam_faillock and the advantages over pam_tally2.
I tested pam_tally2 for a server some time ago, was disappointed and switched to fail2ban. But may be, pam_faillock is a good solution e.g. for my desktop. Greetings, Björn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org