Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 03:34:36AM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
rpm changelog should have basic version and upstream source info, spec changes, which includes any noteworthy integration info, compiler options, enabled/disabled features, and only those software changes and bug fixes supplied by that package on top of upstream.
That's because you're a developer/packager, if you'd be a user who doesn't know about packaging you would demand some info about the functional changes (plus the security changes).
For user visible docu we have the patch descriptions. Since those descriptions are compiled from the changelog entries I agree that the changelog should contain at least some notes about important function changes or new features. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.de/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org