On Fri, Apr 17, Imobach González Sosa wrote:
We have started started to analyze and build a list of the things we would like to address, but we would love to hear your opinion. Do you have some use case you would like to see supported? Which problems have you faced when using AutoYaST? Which features do you miss? Do you have a different vision of what AutoYaST should be (we can learn from those opinions too)?
If I look at something like installing a kubernetes cluster: - many similar machines - most of installation and configuration is identical - small changes in configuration, package list, partitioning, depending on the role of the node. So you have about 5-6 autoyast.xml files, which are all to about 98% identical. Keeping this files in sync is pretty hard. I would like to see that autoyast makes it much easier for the user to maintain one file with small variations which can be used for all roles. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Distinguished Engineer, Senior Architect SLES & MicroOS SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany Managing Director: Felix Imendoerffer (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org