On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 03:28 +0400, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
If some people do worry a lot about the frameworks and libraries used by their apps, they need some real concerns in their life. There's no need for openSUSE to spend time feeding into more of this silly toolkit purism nonsense.
If people do not care which applications they install, they will find out that the desktop settings they had set up do not apply everywhere, a disappointing discovery.
I think THIS is the underlying problem that needs to be addressed, and NOT what toolkit an application is written in. I'm by far not a purist when it comes to the choice of my applications. As long as the app does what I need/want and is appealing, I could really not care less what the dev used as Toolkit to develop it. That's just not my problem. GTK, Qt, Wx... all have their pros and cons.. some devs might love to hack X11 code directly :) Their choice! Who am I to say: nah: you use X11 directly: I don't want to use that app if the app is exactly what I need? Back to the topic: I am aware of a bunch of applications mainly ignoring proxy settings from the desktop. This is indeed very frustrating, as you'd need to configure proxies in various places. THIS for example has been solved with the introduction of libproxy, which passes the 'right' configuration down to the app.. extracted from the running session, whatever it is. Not to say the solution is perfect, but it goes in the right direction. Same approaches can be done for similar problems. All that needs to be done to 'sell' this to App devs or even better get it deep nested in the toolkits (happened for example on the GTK side, as libproxy is needed by libsoup and glib-networking). Same should happen with Qt for example. => Target the actual problem, don't try to conveniently maneuver around it. Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org