On 8/22/22 18:39, Ben Greiner wrote:
Am 22.08.22 um 08:59 schrieb Simon Lees:
On 8/22/22 15:05, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:39:21 +0200, Eric Schirra wrote:
Sorry Takashi,
I don't think that's right. Because a few weeks ago I asked for exactly the same reason how the repos should be called, because you can't find a description/guideline anywhere. I was told: openSUSE_Leap_15.3 15.4 One long and one short. Well. That's how they want it.
I myself don't mind either way, honestly speaking.
If there is neither proper guide line nor official recommendation, I don't mind even to keep them as is, and proactively ignore any complaints about the resource usage.
In reality we have a pretty big mix everywhere with 15.3 some repo's changed others didn't this was pretty much at maintainers discretion while as a community we decided on this list that we should use 15.4 rather then openSUSE_
Whoever told him "how they want it" for 'openSUSE_Leap_15.3', was either wrong or speaking for their own special repo. It went the exact other direction in devel:languages:python, where his request to change it back caused everything to break down.
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.opensuse.org/thread...
I can't find the vote discussion on the mailing list archives anymore but I am pretty sure that it was before the 15.4 times. The change was from openSUSE_Leap_15.3 to 15.3
The decision was made for 15.4 before it was released (So that 15.4 was consistent when repos were created), some maintainers also chose to retrospectively do the change for 15.3 -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B