Le dimanche 18 novembre 2012, à 12:44 -0600, Rajko a écrit :
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:35:37 -0800 Linda Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> wrote:
... referring in a backhanded way to the downward slide of quality and stability...
Not really.
It is the fact that openSUSE is upstream for SUSE enterprise products, but also, that majority of code contributors are SUSE employees, which, in effect, makes openSUSE playground for new technologies in the exactly the same way as Fedora.
I wouldn't call openSUSE a playground, though. Some SUSE employees are contributing to openSUSE with the goal of having some feature land in SUSE enterprise products, but they have to do it following our (openSUSE's) quality standards. We don't have to accept crappy stuff. Now, the definition of "crappy" might be different for people in the community, though ;-) (Just for the record: a good part of SUSE employees contributing to openSUSE do so simply because they use it)
If a developer base structure and size would be different, then all could be handled with lesser annoyances and I'm sure no one would be happier then SUSE.
Indeed :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org