On 6 November 2017 at 14:20, Patrick Shanahan <paka@opensuse.org> wrote:
so we resort to top posting and don't even bother to remove the sig.
My apologies - I posted before my morning coffee, made my formatting a little sloppy it seems. Hopefully this post and the many others I do make it obvious that is not a common problem for me
and probably did not even bother to read the first cited msg/"issues" which contained reference to six bug reports. the poster definitely did not like openSUSE, nor make an effort to find explanations for his "issues", past citing bug reports.
While I think it would have been useful if Fabian linked to the specific comment in question, rather than a whole thread, I did read the thread, in full, as far as I can see. However, the post you reference was written by someone which has been blocked to me on reddit for the last 4 months after I got tired of the individuals trolling. As the individual is blocked, I did not see the persons post until your reply made it obvious I was missing something. I would have noticed the inconsistency if the post had been direct linked also. Thank you for clearing that up.
if one is inclined to slam a post, at least the "facts" should be accurate.
Indeed, I agree. But on a platform like reddit where subreddit moderation, shadow banning, and self-moderation are all commonplace, I think it's reasonable to assume that not everyone will always have as a complete a view of the 'facts' as, lets say if the pertinent data had been copy/pasted in the OP's mail. Regards, -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org