24 Oct
2019
24 Oct
'19
13:20
On 2019/10/24 15:13:38 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2019-10-24 15:03, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
Sorry but sddm is IMHO broken by design and/or upstream. No XDMCP support means that the only way to go remote is to use VNC and this is more like genuine piece of crap. And upstream is not willingly to add XDMCP support.
That would not surprise me. Was XDMCP ever secure (as in, TLS/SSL)? I don't remember it as such.
Does this mean gdm, xdm, and lightdm are unsecure even with XDMCP+MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 also there is a secure version using ssh connection tunnel Werner -- "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr