And we (those running factory of opensuse) were forced to move to gnome 3 unconditionally. Unlike with KDE 3 -> 4 move. Or we might switch to other environment. I chose the latter and won't switch back. I have enough of other work than switching DMs. I'm sad to hear this. Unfortunately, I don't think it would have been
Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011, à 15:44 +0200, Jiri Slaby a écrit : possible to do things differently: there was no way to keep GNOME 2 and GNOME 3 at the same time with our current (read: extremely limited) resources. I'm also interested to hear what's not working for people in the fallback mode compared to a GNOME 2 experience.
If you (general you, not just Jiri) are not happy with how GNOME is developed in openSUSE, I don't think this has anything to do with the way GNOME is
Vincent, On 09/02/2011 10:53 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: maintained/developed in openSUSE. You can only package/maintain the code that is available from upstream. If the upstream project makes decisions people do not like/agree with, unfortunately, the openSUSE GNOME team hears more about it from openSUSE users than upstream. Maybe you should just forward all the "I cannot stand it" messages to the gnome-dev list. ;) I moved to Xfce and no matter what is in store for GNOME 3.2..... I am very unlikely to return to GNOME. I have better things to do than to switch my desktop environment. Of course if the Xfce developers also fall of the rocker who knows..... Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjschwei@suse.com rschweik@ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org