How is: "zypper --no-allow-vendor-change dup" better than "zypper up"? (Or changing the setting in /etc/zypp/zypp.conf and then running "zypper dup") If I am doing it wrong and it may cause problems down the road, I would be interested in changing this. So far, I have a stable OpenSuse tumbleweed with 27 enabled repos. I have seen quite a bit of debate about "zypper up" vs "zypper dup", but I never seem to miss out on anything with "zypper up". -- Ben Ben Holmes Customer Engineer Interactive Pty Ltd Telephone +61 7 3323 0800 Facsimile +61 7 3323 0899 Mobile +61 421 406 456 www.interactive.com.au ------Confidentiality & Legal Privilege------------- "This email is intended for the named recipient only. The information contained in this message may be confidential, or commercially sensitive. If you are not the intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of the email, disclose its contents to any other party, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately. Please delete this message from your computer. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you." ________________________________________ From: Andrei Borzenkov [arvidjaar@gmail.com] Sent: 18 November 2015 13:33 To: Ben Holmes; Jeffrey L. Taylor; opensuse-factory@opensuse.org Subject: Re: [opensuse-factory] 13.1 => Tumbleweed problems 18.11.2015 02:55, Ben Holmes пишет:
After this I added the rest in one at a time and migrate to them as time goes on. After upgrading and due to having a lot of repos, I "zypper up" instead of "zypper dup" where possible to stop swapping to whatever repo has the highest version (that can cause issues).
That is what solver.dupAllowVendorChange (or --no-allow-vendor-change) is for. N�����r��y隊Z)z{.���r�+�맲��r��z�^�ˬz��N�(�֜��^� ޭ隊Z)z{.���r�+��0�����Ǩ�